RMD577 – RESEARCH
METHODOLOGY
(AD2284C)
1.7
Delimitation.
Based on a study made on the comparison
between online class and regular class. This study found that most of them are
on the google form that is the total number of students who like the class as
usual. The method conducted in this study to see how many fine art students
either from diploma or degree that determines them to make a choice whether
class as usual or online class. To ensure that this study is conducted
smoothly, various methods are taken into account to see the average student on
the comparison between online classes or class as usual.
Most of the surveys written by students
are from Uitm Machang Fine art students and also students from Uitm Shah Alam.
Most students choose this face-to-face class because the suitability of this
fine art cost is learning face to face compared to online classes which may
cause problems in students understanding certain subjects. In this case,
face-to-face classes are more of a priority for many so that the learning
process can run as expected.
Language and organization are the keys
to being professional when speaking live. Having conversations in class and
online is different for these fine arts students because the subject of art
will look at a visual angle of space that will show more effective concepts and
ways of delivery for students.
Accurate selection of students in Direct
Interaction can make the discussion active, this class learning provides an
opportunity to meet in the same place at the same time and more actively to discuss
the topics discussed. This also gives students the opportunity to be more
interactive and creative while making presentations.
The conclusion of students' choice on
the quality of Teaching and Learning Between Face-to-Face Methods and online
learning is that the quality of Face to Face teaching and learning methods that
have a "good" value will improve the quality of education at the
University compared to online methods that have "adequate" value.
Until the interaction between students and lecturers in terms of network
quality, is no longer problematic. But as a student must play a good
responsibility in seeking knowledge for success.
1.8
Limitation
There
are some limitations in the comparison between online classes and face-to-face
classes for art students.first, the limitations during the survey process. This
is because the survey made through google form is widely spread to UiTM fine
arts students and only a little spread to fine arts students from other
institutions. So the survey answered by the majority are Uitm Shah Alam and
UiTM Machang Fine art students.
We
also faced limited to communication with other student from other institution,
because we do not have their contact number and can not go to their institution
because movement constraints due to the spread of the epidemic.We got help from
some other student who have contacts from other institution to spread the
survey to them.Its means that this survey cannot be widely disseminated to them
In
addition, the current constraints of generalizability of the data Also one of
limitation. It is because there are many and various answers from students
through surveys. This diversity makes it difficult for us to coordinate
accurate answers to research issues. we need to sort, change and combine to get
the right overall answer and include all the answers they gave.So the result of
this answer is very limited to people or student who experience a same
situation like this student.
Next,
the inevitable constraint is the network problem is also one of limitation.
Most of the processes carried out require internet asses. This means that the
collected data is also taken from the internet, apart from surveys, and
observations. we also discuss these processes through google meet, video call
or massage that requires a good internet network.When there is an internet
problem it will effects our discussion.
uncontrolled
variables, which is the answers given by the students are also influenced by
their surroundings, feelings and opinions. Moreover the circumstances, needs,
facilities and learning of students are different according to the learning
syllabus and different for each institution. This will mean that the response
or answer of these students will change and not be consistent depend on the
current situation.
1.9
Statement of Significant
The intended experimental researches
aims to get the result of student and comparison between online class and
face-to-face class for art students. While research regarding online distant
learning abounds, few studies explore the relationship between art students
satisfaction regarding problems encountered throughout online learning such as
instructor, learning community, and teaching presence.
Teaching presence is one of three primary component of the Community
of Inquiry Model. In their model teaching presence is conceptually aimed at
exploring specifically the instructo and student relationship within online
learning environments. Besides, teaching presence also is a consisting of
design, facilitation, and direction of cognitive and social processes for the
realization of personally meaningful and educationally worthwhile outcomes.
The content of the course that was
studied was singularly varied only by its delivery mode. All course content was
identical. Online students received the exact same lecture materials and
instruction as face-to-face students. The online lecture content was a delayed
video stream version of an earlier meanwhile face-to-face lecture delivered via
the Internet. Both online and face-to-face students received all other course
materials through a university.
The strong similarity in presented course
content, learning materials delivered, and student course work expectations
made for a unique study of the learning environment where instructor variation
was primarily only denoted by the type of delivery received by the students.
The vast majority of studies investigating student rated instructor
satisfaction or teaching presence have by-and-large only looked at either face-to-face
or online learning environments exclusively.
Comments
Post a Comment